Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protestant Nationalist Party

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker^talk 02:46, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Protestant Nationalist Party

Protestant Nationalist Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a somewhat odd nomination, as I created the article a few years ago. It's based on one source, which isn't great, but the book used is reliable on other topics, had a good amount of details on the grouping, and I didn't doubt that there would be more information elsewhere. The problem is that there don't appear to be any other sources mentioning the group, and what information is in the article doesn't check out. While it's verifiable that some Protestants were Irish nationalists, I no longer believe that an organisation of this name existed with the cited details. Whether it's a copyright trap or simply the author covering a subject outside their main area of research, unless someone else can turn up additional reliable sources, it should be deleted. Warofdreams talk 16:22, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:49, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:49, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:49, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

• Delete Non-notable, per nom. Fails WP:GNG & WP:ORG.--JayJasper (talk) 20:40, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
• Delete Can't find any reason to keep. Stacie Croquet (talk) 00:57, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
• Delete - per nom. Snappy (talk) 15:06, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
• Delete. If the creator suggests deletion, and there is not substantial other contributions from others (and there seem not to be, from quick review of article's history), then delete. I hate "fake AFD's" where a creator-nominator suggests an article for deletion when they wish for it to be kept, but they want something else: affirmation, to pre-empt a real AFD, i dunno what other bad reason. Here, the creator-nominator seems serious they want it deleted. Just delete. --doncram 05:14, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.