Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hot Adult Top 40 Tracks number-one hits of 1996
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep; nomination withdrawn with no delete !votes. Rlendog (talk) 18:17, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Hot Adult Top 40 Tracks number-one hits of 1996 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is only a list of songs that hit a specific top 40 list in 1996. There's nothing here to show that this holds any notability or significance. To quote WP:NOT, "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information." Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:52, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Tokyogirl79[reply]
- Keep, number one singles are a reasonably defined topic per WP:SALAT. There is also a huge precedent that lists of number-one singles are acceptable — ones exist for Hot 100, Hot AC, Hot Country Songs and nearly every Billboard chart. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:10, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Not to sound petulant, so lists of weeks of every single Billboard top 40 list is notable for an encyclopedic entry? It just sounds kind of redundant, to be honest. The songs have a category for being top 40 tracks ([Category:Billboard Hot Adult Top 40 Tracks number-one singles]), so it's just a little overly repetitive. If we need to list them by year, wouldn't it be better to have a category specifically for the number one hits of 96 rather than an article that just lists them week by week?Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:14, 13 February 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:37, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:37, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The list is notable enough to get coverage elsewhere. You read about a song, it mentions how long it was on this list. I added a link to the template AdultTop40Tracks which all other articles like this were already linked to apparently. Odd someone left one out. Dream Focus 16:22, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, Most Billboard Charts list them #1 hits week by week. Is there a problem? It's an useful and specific entry. I'll be adding soon the list of Hot Adult Contemporary #1 hits for 1997.
- Withdrawing nomination. I still don't see where a category template wouldn't be more appropriate, but I suppose that listings of every top listing ever made everywhere on earth has complete and total notability and should have lists made of them.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:37, 15 February 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.